The “Starter Kit” of EMS Clinical Performance Measures

 

1.      Time

·        System issue:

1. Performance Measures Project ID

R8(a)

2. Question

Time of symptoms to access of 911 system

3. Proposed Indicator Name

Average Time to Access

4. Key Process Path

Operations: Response Intervals > All

5. Patient/Customer Need

Speed of access to and response of system following onset of emergency

6. Type of Measure

Process

7. Objective

Reduce all times

8. Indicator Formula

Summed differences between two date/time values divided by the number of events for which times are recorded

9. Indicator Formula 

    Description

Average times

10. Denominator

      Description

Number of events for which times are recorded

10.a Denominator Inclusion

        Criteria                

Count all events for which the values for E05-01 and E05-02 are present and pass logic test

10.b Denominator Exclusion

        Criteria

None

10.c Denominator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS state or agency level

11. Numerator Description

Sum of time differences: value of E05-02 minus value of E05-01

11.a Numerator Inclusion

        Criteria                

Values for E05-01 and E05-02 are present and pass logic test

 

11.b Numerator Exclusion

        Criteria

None

11.c Numerator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS state or agency level

12. Sampling Allowed

 

13. Sampling Description

 

14. Minimum Number of

      Data Points

Two plus agency/locale and time/date identifiers

15. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Numerical

Minutes/seconds

16. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Graphical

 

17. Suggest Reporting

      Frequency

Monthly/Annual

18. Testing

 

19. Stratification

 

20. Stratification Options

 

21. Current Development

      Status

 

22. Additional Information

 

23. References

 

24. Contributors

 

·        Benchmark issue: time of dispatch to arrive patient

1. Performance Measures Project ID

R8(b)

2. Question

Time of dispatch to arrive patient

3. Proposed Indicator Name

Average response time

4. Key Process Path

Operations: Response Intervals > All

5. Patient/Customer Need

Speed of access to and response of system following onset of emergency

6. Type of Measure

Process

7. Objective

Reduce all times

8. Indicator Formula

Summed differences between two date/time values divided by the number of events for which times are recorded

9. Indicator Formula 

    Description

Average times

10. Denominator

      Description

Number of events for which times are recorded

10.a Denominator Inclusion

        Criteria                

Count all events for which values for E05-04 (time responding unit was notified by dispatch) and E05-06 (time when responding vehicle arrives on scene and stops moving) are present and pass logic test

10.b Denominator Exclusion

        Criteria

None

10.c Denominator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS state or agency level

 

11. Numerator Description

Value of E05-06 minus value of E05-04

 

11.a Numerator Inclusion

        Criteria                

Values for E05-04 and E05-06 are present and pass logic test

 

11.b Numerator Exclusion

        Criteria

None

11.c Numerator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS state or agency level

12. Sampling Allowed

 

13. Sampling Description

 

14. Minimum Number of

      Data Points

Two plus agency/locale and time/date identifiers

15. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Numerical

Minutes/seconds

16. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Graphical

 

17. Suggest Reporting

      Frequency

Monthly/Annual

18. Testing

 

19. Stratification

 

20. Stratification Options

 

21. Current Development

      Status

 

22. Additional Information

 

23. References

 

24. Contributors

 

1.      Respiratory

·        The percentage of patients who require respiratory support that receive it

1. Performance Measures Project ID

Q6

2. Question

The percentage of patients who require oxygen for respiratory support that receive it

3. Proposed Indicator Name

Appropriate Oxygen Administration Rate

4. Key Process Path

Clinical Care: Respiratory Management > Appropriate Oxygen Rate

5. Patient/Customer Need

Patients with respiratory compromise in the EMS setting who require oxygen

6. Type of Measure

Process

7. Objective

Increase rate in appropriate patients

8. Indicator Formula

Number of respiratory distress/arrest patients receiving oxygen in a given period divided by total respiratory distress/arrest patients in that period

9. Indicator Formula 

    Description

Percentage of patients for whom a provider impression of respiratory distress/arrest or breathing problems is created that receive oxygen

10. Denominator

      Description

Number of patients creating a provider impression of respiratory distress/arrest or breathing problems.

10.a Denominator Inclusion

        Criteria                

Patients with NHTSA value “799.10- Respiratory arrest” or

“786.09- Respiratory distress” for either element E09-15 or E09-16 or value 1410 - Breathing Problem for E09-13 or E09-14. 

10.b Denominator Exclusion

        Criteria

None

10.c Denominator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS state level

11. Numerator Description

Number of patients creating a provider impression of respiratory distress/arrest  who receive oxygen

11.a Numerator Inclusion

        Criteria                

Patients with NHTSA value “799.10- Respiratory arrest” or

“786.09- Respiratory distress” for either element E09-15 or E09-16 or value 1410 - Breathing Problem for E09-13 or E09-14 and who have a NHTSA value for “oxygen” for element E18-03.  This should also include oxygen administered prior to arrival of EMS unit (E09-01).

11.b Numerator Exclusion

        Criteria

None

11.c Numerator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS state level

12. Sampling Allowed

No

13. Sampling Description

NA

14. Minimum Number of

      Data Points

Three plus agency/locale and time/date identifiers

15. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Numerical

Raw Ratio maintaining the original numbers

16. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Graphical

 

17. Suggest Reporting

      Frequency

Monthly

18. Testing

 

19. Stratification

 

20. Stratification Options

 

21. Current Development

      Status

 

22. Additional Information

 

23. References

 

24. Contributors

 

·        How long did it take to provide respiratory support?

1. Performance Measures Project ID

None

2. Question

How long did it take to provide respiratory support?

3. Proposed Indicator Name

Average Time to Respiratory Support

4. Key Process Path

Respiratory care provided

5. Patient/Customer Need

Early intervention of oxygen to improve SPO2 saturations

6. Type of Measure

Process

7. Objective

Decrease time it takes to apply oxygen

8. Indicator Formula

Time of arrival of EMS unit to the time that oxygen was applied for respiratory distress/arrest patients in a given period.

9. Indicator Formula 

    Description  

Mean average times

10. Denominator

      Description

The number of Respiratory distress/arrest patients in which oxygen is administered and times are recorded.

10.a Denominator Inclusion

        Criteria                

Count all events for which:

Values for E05-06 and E18-01 are present and pass logic test

10.b Denominator Exclusion

        Criteria

None

10.c Denominator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS state level

11. Numerator Description

Value of E05-06 minus value of E18-01

11.a Numerator Inclusion

        Criteria                

Value of E05-06 and E18-01 are present and pass the logic test.

11.b Numerator Exclusion

        Criteria

None

11.c Numerator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS state level

12. Sampling Allowed

No

13. Sampling Description

N/A

14. Minimum Number of

      Data Points

 

15. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Numerical

Minutes/seconds

16. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Graphical

 

17. Suggest Reporting

      Frequency

 

18. Testing

 

19. Stratification

 

20. Stratification Options

 

21. Current Development

      Status

 

22. Additional Information

 

23. References

 

24. Contributors

 

1.      Accuracy

 

1. Performance Measures Project ID

None

2. Question

Accuracy score of PCR

3. Proposed Indicator Name

Completion percentage of the PCR

4. Key Process Path

 

5. Patient/Customer Need

Completeness of the PCR

6. Type of Measure

Process

7. Objective

To determine how many records have values listed in each of fields E01-01, E02-01, E02-04, E02-05, E02-12, E02-20, E03-01, E05-02, E05-04, and E05-11.

8. Indicator Formula

The total number of events in a given period in which there of value listed for each of elements E01-01, E02-01, E02-04, E02-05, E02-12, E02-20, E03-01, E05-02, E05-04, and E05-11 divided by the total number of events.

9. Indicator Formula  

    Description  

Look at the selected fields and determine whether all are filled in.

10. Denominator

      Description

All reported events.

10.a Denominator Inclusion

        Criteria                

All events

10.b Denominator Exclusion

        Criteria

None

10.c Denominator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS State Level

11. Numerator Description

The total number of events for which all of the values are complete for the NHTSA elements listed.

11.a Numerator Inclusion

        Criteria                

All events where there is a value for E01-01, E02-01, E02-04, E02-05, E02-12, E02-20, E03-01, E05-02, E05-04, and E05-11.

11.b Numerator Exclusion

        Criteria

None

11.c Numerator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS State Level

12. Sampling Allowed

 

13. Sampling Description

 

14. Minimum Number of

      Data Points

 

15. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Numerical

Percentage

16. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Graphical

 

17. Suggest Reporting

      Frequency

 

18. Testing

 

19. Stratification

 

20. Stratification Options

 

21. Current Development

      Status

 

22. Additional Information

 

23. References

 

24. Contributors

 

·        ALS Subset: the percentage of patients whose condition indicated ALS that actually received it

1. Performance Measures Project ID

CC11

2. Question

ALS Subset: the percentage of patients whose condition indicated ALS that actually received it

3. Proposed Indicator Name

EKG Performance Rate

4. Key Process Path

Clinical Care: ACS > EKG Lead Performance Rate

5. Patient/Customer Need

Early performance of diagnostic EKG can accelerate definitive care

6. Type of Measure

Process

7. Objective

Increase rate in appropriate patients

8. Indicator Formula

Number of chest pain patients having EKG, 3 – 12 leads, in a given period divided by total chest pain patients in that period

9. Indicator Formula 

    Description

Percentage of patients for whom a provider impression of chest pain/discomfort is created that have a 3-12 lead EKG performed

10. Denominator

      Description

Number of patients creating a provider impression of Chest Pain /discomfort

10.a Denominator Inclusion

        Criteria                

Patients with NHTSA value “1650 786.50- Chest pain / discomfort” for either element E09-15 or E09-16.  EKG performed by ALS Providers.

10.b Denominator Exclusion

        Criteria

Patients < 18 years of age (E06-14/E06-15 - E05-02, or E06-16) .  EKG is performed by someone other than ALS Providers.

10.c Denominator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS state level

11. Numerator Description

Number of patients creating a provider impression of chest pain/discomfort who have an EKG (3-12 lead) performed by ALS Providers

11.a Numerator Inclusion

        Criteria                

Patients with NHTSA value “1650 786.50- Chest pain / discomfort” for element E09-15 (Primary impression) or “1785 786.50- Chest pain / discomfort” for E09-16 (Secondary impression) and have “3 -12 lead EKG” indicated in Procedures list (Performed) (D04-04) (E19-03))/89.510 – Cardiac Monitor or 89.820 - 12 lead ECG.

11.b Numerator Exclusion

        Criteria

Patients < 18 years of age (E06-14/E06-15 – E05-04, or E06-16).  EKG performed by someone other than ALS Providers

11.c Numerator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS state level

12. Sampling Allowed

No

13. Sampling Description

NA

14. Minimum Number of

      Data Points

Six plus agency/locale and time/date identifiers

15. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Numerical

Percentage

16. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Graphical

 

17. Suggest Reporting

      Frequency

 

18. Testing

 

19. Stratification

 

20. Stratification Options

 

21. Current Development

      Status

 

22. Additional Information

 

23. References

 

24. Contributors

 

·        BLS Subset: time to defibrillation

1. Performance Measures Project ID

CC4

2. Question

BLS Subset: Time to defibrillation

3. Proposed Indicator Name

Time to Defibrillation

4. Key Process Path

Clinical Care: ACS > Defibrillation Time

5. Patient/Customer Need

Speed of access to defibrillation when needed.

6. Type of Measure

Process

7. Objective

Reduce time

8. Indicator Formula

Time intervals from onset of V-fib to defibrillation summed for a given period, divided by the number of time intervals reported during the period

9. Indicator Formula 

    Description  

The mean average time interval from onset of V-fib, in which a patient is defibrillated, to the first defibrillation, for a given period of time.

10. Denominator

      Description

The number of V-fib events in a given period in which defibrillation is attempted

10.a Denominator Inclusion

        Criteria                

NHTSA E19-03 has values for “defibrillation” (manual or AED) Manual Defibrillation – 99.622 and AED Defibrillation – 99.621

10.b Denominator Exclusion

        Criteria

When data is excluded from numerator, associated event count is excluded from denominator

10.c Denominator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS state level

11. Numerator Description

The time from onset of V-fib to first defibrillation

11.a Numerator Inclusion

        Criteria                

NHTSA E5-01 with E11-01 (see notes below)  values of either 2240 – yes, prior to EMS arrival or 2245 – yes, after EMS arrival and E19-01 present for E19-03 “defibrillation” procedure

11.b Numerator Exclusion

        Criteria

Values for E5-01 or E19-01 missing or fail sequence logic test.

11.c Numerator Data

        Sources

NEMSIS state level

12. Sampling Allowed

No

13. Sampling Description

NA

14. Minimum Number of

      Data Points

Three plus agency/locale ID elements

15. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Numerical

Minutes/seconds

16. Suggest Reporting

      Format: Graphical

 

17. Suggest Reporting

      Frequency

Annual

18. Testing

No

19. Stratification

 

20. Stratification Options

 

21. Current Development

      Status

 

22. Additional Information

 

23. References

 

24. Contributors